1 august 2010

some maths

There are some, king Gelon, who think that the number of the sand is infinite in multitude; and I mean by the sand not only that which exists about Syracuse and the rest of Sicily but also that which is found in every region whether inhabited or uninhabited. Again there are some who, without regarding it as infinite, yet think that no number has been named which is great enough to exceed its magnitude. And it is clear that they who hold this view, if they imagined a mass made up of sand in other respects as large as the mass of the Earth, including in it all the seas and the hollows of the Earth filled up to a height equal to that of the highest of the mountains, would be many times further still from recognizing that any number could be expressed which exceeded the multitude of the sand so taken.

- Archimedes

How many grains of sand are there in the world? It's difficult if not impossible to know this, but instead we can work out how many sand grains there aren't - or at least a figure that we know is greater than the actual number, just to show ourselves (a) that we can do some kind of sensible calculation involving sand, but more importantly (b) that there isn't an infinite number of grains.

Our starting point is an approximation (always start from one of these so your readers can begin to pick holes in your argument straight away - this makes them feel better), that a litre of sand contains about 10 million grains. Since there are 1012 litres in a cubic kilometre, this gives us a figure of 1 x 1019 grains per cubic kilometre.

Now, how much sand is on the planet? We don't know and have no way of knowing, so let's set up a reductio ad absurdam which will generate a ballpark total answer to our problem. Imagine that all water in all seas is replaced by sand, like Archimedes said. Average sea depth is 3.7 km, let's take that as a yardstick (eh?). Now fill the space above sea level to the height of the world's tallest sand dune (the Cerro Blanco in Nazca, Peru) which is 2 km above sea level (note - not the highest mountain, Archimedes wasn't so cute there). We have now covered the planet in a layer of sand about 5.7 km thick. This of course is much more than is in fact present on Earth, so we need to make a guess as to what fraction a run a calculation on. We can't guess - is it a millionth, a squillionth, or what? Let's make it easy by dividing by 5.7 so our layer is exactly 1 km thick (readers very pleased now).

What's the volume of this layer? Assume that the radius of the Earth is 6370 km, add our sand layer and calculate the volume of the whole using the formula 4/3πr3:

4/3 x π x 63713 = 1,083,206,916,846 km3

(Note to self: Earth volume is about a trillion cubic km). Now do the whole thing again without the sand layer:

4/3 x π x 63703 = 1,082,696,932,430 km3

Now take one from the other to find the volume of our sand layer, which turns out to be 509,984,416 km3. Or more simply, 5 x 108 km3. Multiplying up by our grains per km3 figure, this gives us a sand layer containing 5 x 1027 grains.

This is about ten thousand times Avogadro's number, so as many sand grains as there are water molecules in ten thousand (small, 18ml) glasses of water. Or if we're out by a factor of ten thousand-ish and our 1 km sand layer was way too thick, there may be only as many sand grains on the planet as there are water molecules in single, small glass of water.


| comment

5 august 2010

* * *   bhikku is off to Malaysian Borneo to see the giant earthworms, your men the orangutangs, and maybe this kind of thing:

The beauty and brilliancy of this insect are indescribable, and none but a naturalist can understand the intense excitement I experienced when I at length captured it. On taking it out of my net and opening the glorious wings, my heart began to beat violently, the blood rushed to my head, and I felt much more like fainting than I have done when in apprehension of immediate death. I had a headache the rest of the day, so great was the excitement produced by what will appear to most people a very inadequate cause.

- Alfred Russell Wallace, The Malay Archipelago

See you later on  * * *

| comment

25 august 2010


click to enlarge

Two sets of sand samples from Borneo islands:
Upper 2: from Pulau Dinawan, off Kinarut
Lower 2: from Pulau Tiga, Kimanis bay

| comment

26 august 2010

Borneo rain

| comment